Chen Dong vs Calum Puttergill Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Dong vs C. Puttergill

Chen Dong
AUS
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
22
Age
32
-
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
0
C. Rank
888
0
Best Rank
663
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Calum Puttergill
AUS
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
22
Age
32
-
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
0
C. Rank
888
0
Best Rank
663
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Dong 0 - 0 Puttergill
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dong | 0 |
| Puttergill | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
C. Dong vs C. Puttergill H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.88% (38-30) | Career Total W/L | 49.13% (170-176) |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Dong vs C. Puttergill Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chen Dong has won 42.35% of points on their second serve, while Calum Puttergill has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chen Dong, in recent form, has won 44.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Calum Puttergill has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.78% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chen Dong has saved 52.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Calum Puttergill has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chen Dong has won 53.66% of matches played (W/L 22/19), with Calum Puttergill winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chen Dong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 31/23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/2). Calum Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 38/34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Chen Dong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.66% of matches (W/L 22/19), where as Calum Puttergill has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chen Dong has played against opponents with an average rank of 310.39 while Calum Puttergill has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chen Dong has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Calum Puttergill has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chen Dong has converted 34.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Calum Puttergill has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Chen Dong vs Calum Puttergill Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Dong 48%, Puttergill 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Dong 51%, Puttergill 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Dong 59%, Puttergill 0%.
C. Dong Recent Matches Played
C. Puttergill Recent Matches Played

C. Dong vs C. Puttergill Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.88% (38/30) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.13% (170/176) |
| 53.59% (82/71) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.24% (388/400) |
| 51.80% (761/708) | Games Win/Loss | 50.02% (3589/3586) |
| 57.41% (31/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.24% (123/132) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.78% (38/34) |
| 54.55% (6/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (9/9) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 70 | Aces Total | 353 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 67 | Total Double Faults | 1064 |
| 1:6:27 | Average Match Time | 1:2:41 |
| 286.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 416.5 |
| 70% (2001/2868) | 1st Serve % | 62% (8855/14246) |
| 64% (1272/2001) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5467/8855) |
| 49% (422/867) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2341/5392) |
| 48% (118/245) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (715/1571) |
| 40% (1115/2812) | Return Points Win % | 43% (6080/14225) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 38.36% (28/45) |
| 55.88% (38/30) | Futures W/L | 52.01% (142/131) |
| 55% (37/67) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (169/344) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 69% (9/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (30/72) |
| 56% (10/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (48/96) |
| 85% (40/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (169/147) |
| 15% (40/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (169/22) |
| 11% (28/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (177/23) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
01:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.666
W2
2.05
09:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
3.94
W2
1.2
12:00 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.44
W2
2.55
03:00 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.2
W2
3.94
07:00 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.68
W2
2.03
08:00 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
4.333
W2
1.168
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Marco Cecchinato vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Gustavo Heide vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Ben Shelton vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico